HotelRamada Inverness > External review

Your hotel?
Ramada Inverness
trivago rating:
73 out of 100
197 Sources
Church Street
IV11DX Inverness
trivago price comparison:
Ramada InvernessRamada InvernessRamada InvernessRamada Inverness

Och Aye an did you see the wee beastie?

Article in dooyoo.co.uk about Ramada Inverness from Apr 2002

Overall rating:
70 out of 100


dooyoo.co.uk   
Author:   whitby
Date posted:13.03.2008 21:47
Found by:weetoon, Ecosse



Room (more)
88 out of 100
Size
90 out of 100
Cleanliness
70 out of 100

General hotel amenities (more)
64 out of 100
Appearance/Architecture
60 out of 100
Lobby Atmosphere
70 out of 100

Food & Beverages (more)
75 out of 100
Food Variety
90 out of 100
Food Quality
90 out of 100

Location and surroundings
65 out of 100
Location (City)
80 out of 100
Quiet Location
50 out of 100

This reviewer relates a 3 nights stay at the Ramada Jarvis Inverness on business. Situated about "fifteen-minute drive" away from the airport and "close to [the] city centre", with access "from two parallel roads", which means the hotel has two entrances. The one she was led to the first time was not "too inviting", prompting thoughts of "Ugh - look at the state of this place!". The other side though gives a "better image" of the hotel.

In common with "most chain group hotels", check in was a " very smooth process" with the offer of a "wake up call" and of the "morning paper". However, she did not think it was "very acceptable" that several guests had to have their keys "reactivated" after a few days.

The foyer is "spacious" and offers "plenty of soft seating". Although there are 2 bars, guests are not really offered a choice as "only one was staffed" most of the time. They also seemed to have "ran out" of several things.

Moving on to the "spacious studio rooms", which she found "well equipped", hers having an "excellent view across Inverness" thanks to "large windows". The TV had both terrestrial and satellite channels, and she remarks with amusement that the "porno" had to be ordered by phone from reception. You could also "view your hotel bill" on it, which was "a good idea" to check that it was correct.

Although the room was "generally cleaned", she felt some areas were missed and items brought up from the bar "were not removed the following morning " which meant "quite a collection" built up. The courtesy tray was also not always "replenished". She got a "restful sleep" there, but rooms on the other side of the hotel had to put up with the noise caused by "boy racers" and "a good few drunks!".

The bathroom's shower "cannot be faulted", and neither can " the very good selection of toiletries".

The restaurant had a "nice menu", with a "good selection" for breakfast, "very tasty" evening meal (options "changed daily"). It was served by "always friendly" but somewhat disorganised staff, who "ran out of two wines" during the stay.

On the whole, she felt the staff, whilst "not impolite or rude" did not always "go that extra mile" for guests. Although she would "visit again", she doesn't "recommend" the hotel as better ones can be found "within this price bracket".
This review is an interpretation of the above mentioned author

Read the full article at:

dooyoo.co.uk

Do you think this external review is helpful?

Comments to this external review

You can leave comments to the author or the photographer. Do you like what you see? Do you have more questions? He/she looks forward to your message.